Electricity board rajasthan v. mohan lal
WebElectricity (Supply) Act (54 of 1948)-State Electricity Board constituted under Act-If “State”. JUDGMENT: CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 466 of 1966. … WebAug 18, 2011 · Rajasthan State Electricity Board & Ors. v. Shri Mohanlal & Anr. Narendra Kumar Jain, J.:—. This appeal on behalf of defendants under Section 96 of the Code of …
Electricity board rajasthan v. mohan lal
Did you know?
Mohanlal, and the other 10 workers were all provisionally placed at the disposal of the Electricity Board of Rajasthan, Jaipur by a notification issued by the Government on 12th February 1958, purporting to exercise its powers under section 78A of Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948. Previously all of them were … See more The case deals with the scope of the term ‘State’ defined under Article 12 of the Indian Constitution and the word ‘local authority’. A petition was filed before the High Court of Rajasthan by Mohanlal, regarding his … See more The case is a Special leave appeal filed by the State Electricity Board of Rajasthan before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India against the order passed by the High Court of Rajasthan. … See more Article 12 of the Indian Constitution defines the term ‘State’. Unless the context otherwise requires, the word ‘State’ shall include The Government and Parliament of India, The Government and the Legislature of … See more WebConstitutional Law Lecture 5 Rajasthan State Electricity Board v Mohanlal (AIR 1967 SC 1857.) Sukhdev Singh v Bhagat Ram ((1975) 1 SCC 421.) Sabhajit Tewary v Union of India ((1975) 1 SCC 485.) Ramana Dayaram Shetty v International Airport Authority (hereinafter RD Shetty) (1979) 3 SCC 489- agencies or instrumentalities test
Web• Rajasthan Electricity Board – body constituted on July 1st 1957 under Electricity (supply) Act 1948 (No. 54 of 1948) • Before constitution of the Board, State got electricity directly by Electrical and Mechanical Dept. of State • Respondent 1 and Respondents 4 to 14 – foreman - permanent members of the Dept.
WebRajasthan Electricity Board v. Mohanlal, AIR 1967 SC 1857; Sukhdev v. Bhagatram, AIR 1975 SC 1331; Khalasis in Railway carriage section - Bajranglal v. State, AIR 1976 SC … Web(A) R. D. Shetty v. International Airport Authority [ ] (B) Ajay Hasia v. Khalid Mujit[ ] (C) Electricity Board Rajasthan v. Mohan Lal [ ] 2) Which of the following is not true vis-à-vis Article 13 of the Constitution of India? (A) A constitutional amendment Act passed under Article 368 is law within the meaning of the Article 13 [ ]
WebJul 31, 2011 · Mohanlal, AIR 1967 SC 1857) and the judgment of the Court was affirmed vide order 3-4-1967. Reaching the conclusion that the respondent was no longer the …
WebThe respondent in that case relied on Dr. Fajans' report to argue that electricity is tangible personal property.The Board concluded that Dr. Fajans' report instead led to the conclusion that the sale of is the sale of a service. The Board noted … didn\\u0027t come in spanishWebMay 29, 2024 · UNION OF INDIA v. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS. LawFoyer. 21 July 2024 0 . Case Analysis. ST. STEPHEN’S COLLEGE V. UNIVERSITY OF DELHI. LawFoyer. 20 July 2024 0 ... KIRTI AND ANOTHER V. ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED. LawFoyer. 7 July 2024 0 . Case Analysis. Jayamma vs State of Karnataka. … didnt stand a chance chordsWebRajasthan Electricity Board v. Mohanlal, AIR 1967 SC 1857; Sukhdev v. Bhagatram, AIR 1975 SC 1331; Khalasis in Railway carriage section - Bajranglal v. State, AIR 1976 SC 1008 - Teacher in services of the Government, State of Ajmer v. Shivjilal, AIR. 1959 SC 847: A Minister of State Shiv Bahadur Singh v. State of M.P., AIR 1953 SC 391; Chairman ... didn\\u0027t detect another display dellWebMohanlal was an employee of the Mechanical Department and his services were provisionally placed at the disposal of the Board. In 1960 he was deputed as Assistant Engineer, Electrical, in the Public Works Department (Buildings and Roads) by order of the Government dated 27th January, 1960. didnt\\u0027 get any pe offersWebARTICLE 12 1963 - Rajasthan State Electricity Board v. Mohanlal The case involved a promotion dispute between some workmen and the Rajasthan State Electricity Board. Articles 14 and 16 claims were raised, and consequently, the preliminary question that fell to be determined by the Court was whether the Board came within the purview of Part III, … didnt it rain sister rosettaWebApr 14, 2024 · Rajasthan Electricity Board v. Mohan Lal (1967) In this case, it was held by the High Court that the State Electricity Board is to be considered as State within the definition of Article 12. It was further held that any organization that is created by the law and given power by the government is considered as State under Article 12. didnt shake medication before useWebMohan Lal And Others . Bhargava, J.— The appellant in this appeal is Electricity Board of Rajasthan, Jaipur (hereinafter referred to as “the Board”), a body corporate constituted on 1st July, 1957, under the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 (54 of 1948). didnt mean to brag song