Sample reviewer comments on a manuscript
WebReviewers' Comments: Reviewer #1 (Remarks to the Author) This manuscript reports experimental realization of an electromechanical system, based on the use ... sample. In … WebIn this contribution, I present and describe the content of the response document in the format of a specimen by discussing different situations that may be encountered when dealing with...
Sample reviewer comments on a manuscript
Did you know?
WebJun 12, 2014 · (PDF) Reviewer comments Authors: Kun Hyung Kim Pusan National University Ji Ho Ryu Pusan National University Maeng Real Park Pusan National University Yong In Kim Available via license: CC BY-NC... Web• Results, powder sample testing no TWC, 2nd paragraph: Need to include comment on carbon balance • Results, powder sample testing no TWC, 2nd paragraph: sentence start …
WebAdditionally, I would usually have a couple of projects that had come back with reviewer comments after their initial submission to a journal, so I am used to working on manuscript revisions as well. Webinvaluable comments. We have carefully addressed all the comments. The corresponding changes and refinements made in the revised paper are summarized in our response below. Reviewer #2: This paper has a potential to be accepted, but some important points have to be clarified or fixed before we can proceed and a positive action can be taken.
WebReviewer #2 (Remarks to the Author): Dear authors, I read with interest your manuscript entitled "Water as Oxygen Transfer Reagent in a Homogeneously Catalysed Conversion of Formaldehyde to H2", the provided supporting information, and I checked the cited key-references about the hydrogen generation from formaldehyde in water. WebMay 18, 2024 · Peer review is at the heart of the scientific process. Reviewers independently examine a submitted manuscript and then recommend acceptance, rejection or – most frequently – revisions to be made before it gets published [].Editors rely on peer review to make decisions on which submissions warrant publication and to enhance quality …
WebApr 14, 2024 · Background: Acetabular fractures result from high-energy trauma, and their complex anatomy poses a challenge to surgeons for open reduction and internal fixation of these fractures. The goal of fixation is an anatomical reduction of articular surfaces and stable fixation with minimal damage to vital structures around. The long-term clinical …
Webreview the manuscript. 4) Upon accepting an invitation you will be provided three weeks to complete your review. When writing your review: 1) Keep in mind that reviewers serve as mentors to authors, helping to revise an article until each is suitable for pub-lication. Both complimentary and critical comments are vital to the process. jaxon player transferWebAssess the originality (contribution, addition of knowledge to scientific literature or field) of the manuscript. Clearly identify the strengths and weaknesses of the method described in … lowry access formWebMay 1, 2024 · An example would be if you’re reviewing a very technical manuscript for a broad journal such as American Psychologist, which focuses on major developments across all of psychology. "In your note to the author, you should feel free to make suggestions about the best place to resubmit the manuscript," Sokol-Chang adds. 5: Map out a plan jaxon office furnitureWebBelow are my comments on “Racial Markers and Oppression ….” For purposes of clarity, throughout my comments, 12/4/5 will mean page 12, paragraph 4, line 5 of the manuscript … lowry acidWebComments from the reviewers: Reviewer: 1 Recommendation: Comments: I would like to thank the authors for addressing my initial comments. Following the revision to the article, some of my additional comments relate to some of the amendments made, and the authors may therefore wish to discuss these particular suggestions with the editor. lowry academy websiteWebPeer review, also known as refereeing, is a collaborative process that allows independent experts in the same field of research to evaluate and comment on manuscript submissions. The outcome of a peer review gives authors feedback to improve their work and, critically, allows the editor to assess the paper’s suitability for publication. lowry actorWebUsing our Rapid Technical Review service, you can get our expert panelists, all of whom have published peer-reviewed papers, to review your paper and provide constructive comments so that you can improve your manuscript BEFORE submission to the journal of your choice. The assessment process applied in the Editage Rapid Technical Review has been ... jaxon photography atlanta